- Meaning
- This idiom means to show no mercy, compassion, or leniency, as if refusing to spare an enemy in battle. It conveys ruthless determination, often used in competitive, professional, or confrontational contexts to depict unrelenting action. The phrase carries a tone of severity, resolve, or aggression, reflecting cultural values of toughness and the human tendency to dominate. Its military imagery evokes a brutal stance, resonating in scenarios like negotiations or rivalries. The idiom emphasizes uncompromising resolve, making it a stark metaphor for mercilessness.
- Origin
- The phrase originated in 17th-century Europe, tied to military practice where ‘quarter’ meant sparing a defeated enemy’s life, as noted in naval records. Its metaphorical use emerged in the 18th century, with *The London Gazette* (1700s) using it for relentless campaigns. The idiom gained traction in 19th-century literature, notably in Walter Scott’s *Ivanhoe* (1820). Its spread was amplified by war stories and 20th-century media, especially in *The Times* for sports and politics. Its adoption across English-speaking cultures stems from its intense imagery and relevance to competition.
- Variants
-
- No quarter given
- Give no quarter
- Offer no quarter
- Examples
-
- She gave no quarter in the debate, dismantling her opponent’s arguments.
- No quarter given, the team played with ruthless intensity.
- Offer no quarter, he vowed, pursuing the lawsuit aggressively.
- Give no quarter, they did, outbidding rivals in the auction.
- Giving no quarter, she pushed the project to completion despite obstacles.
|